Safety and efficacy of automatic capture threshold algorithms in left bundle branch area pacing

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Automatic capture algorithms periodically measure the minimal quantity current needed for pacing, self-adjusting output to guarantee consistent myocardial capture, enhancing patient safety in case an unexpected rise threshold and reducing drain. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is emerging conduction system (CSP) technique which overcomes technical issues weaknesses pure Hisian pacing. Purpose The aim our study was evaluate efficacy automatic a population patients with LBBAP. Methods We prospectively enrolled receiving LBBAP different companies provide material) we evaluated accuracy at 24 hours 3 months after implantation. Moreover, when available, home monitoring used follow up. Results included 45 consecutive who underwent from January 2022 August 2022. At hours, mean manual 0.5±0.2 V 0.4 msec, while 0.5±0.3 msec (p = 0.30). 0.6±0.2V vs 0.25). Sensing impedance measures where optimal improved during up, respectively 13.7±4.8 mV 13.9±4.8 0.6) 460.1±130 Ohm 417.1±96.2 0.1). Conclusion are able effectively both acute phase possibility safely use algorithms, thus preserving battery protecting against possible future rises, represents another advantage

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cardiac pacing in left bundle branch/bifascicular block patients.

The primary concern in patients with bifascicular block is the increased risk of progression to complete heart block. Further, an additional first-degree A-V block in patients with bifascicular block or LBBB might increase the risk of block progression. Anesthesia, monitoring and surgical techniques can induce conduction defects and bradyarrhythmias in patients with pre-existing bundle branch b...

متن کامل

Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVE To compare the different effects of right ventricular pacing and classic left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. DESIGN Retrospective and prospective study of 48 patients by electrocardiography, and M mode, cross sectional, and Doppler echocardiography. SETTING A tertiary cardiac referral centre. PATIENTS 48 patients (age range 21 to 89 years, 15 women), 24 with a...

متن کامل

Left Bundle Branch Block

Coronary angiography, cine left ventriculography, and the cardiovascular hemodynamics of 24 patients with left bundle branch block were studied. Seven patients were found to have significant coronary artery disease, always severe. Five had cardiomyopathy and seven had valvular disease. Only those with coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy had abnormal left ventricular contraction patterns. ...

متن کامل

Left bundle branch block.

A RECENT STUDY of the prognosis of patients with left bundle branch block (L.B.B.B.) suggested that life expectancy was extremely short (Smith and Hayes 1965). While in general L.B.B.B. has a sinister reputation, we have been struck by a few individuals who have survived many years with L.B.B.B., and we thought an analysis of some of the material available at the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfas...

متن کامل

Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle-branch hearts.

BACKGROUND We investigated the benefits of the more physiological activation achieved by left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO) as compared with conventional epicardial (EPI) LV pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS In 8 anesthetized dogs with experimental left bundle-branch block, pacing leads were positioned in the right atrium, right ventricle, and at 8 ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Europace

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1099-5129', '1532-2092']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad122.375